Reasonable Modification Rights Drastically Restricted in Michigan

Steve Tomkowiak • March 16, 2021

 

The Michigan Persons With Disabilities Civil Rights Act (PWDCRA) and the federal Fair Housing Act (FHA) permit persons with disabilities to request reasonable modifications to their dwelling units and common areas as necessary to ameliorate the effects of their disabilities. Common reasonable modifications include installing ramps to the entrances of dwelling units and adding grab bars in bathrooms.

 

 

The Michigan Court of Appeals, in the published decision of In re Romig, Nos. 347653 & 384653 (Oct. 15, 2020), narrowly

ery

ink with target http://publicdocs.courts.mi.gov/opinions/final/coa/20201015_c347653_75_347653.opn.pdf

construed the reasonable accommodation provision of the PWDCRA. The case involved a seventy-six-year-old man with limited ability to stand and walk. A reasonable modification request was made to install a railing on the front porch and adjacent stairs at his home.  According to the Court of Appeals, a housing provider may be required to grant a reasonable modification request only if the request is submitted at the time of the original sale, exchange, rental, or lease of the dwelling. Should a person after  taking possession of housing (i.e., post-acquisition) later becomes disabled and in need of a reasonable modification, the request need not be granted. Further, only the individual personally making the sale, exchange, rent, or lease is entitled to any disability-related reasonable modification or protections under the PWDCRA.

 

 

The decision ignores the word “occupied” in Section 506a(1)(a) of the PWDCRA, which expressly permits “reasonable modifications of existing premises  occupied or to be occupied by the person with a disability if those modifications may be necessary to afford the person with a disability full enjoyment of the premises.” The Michigan legislature enacted Section 506a of the PWDCRA to make sure that Michigan law remains consistent with the FHA, which entitles persons with disabilities to request “reasonable modifications of existing premises occupied or to be occupied” (emphasis added), whenever warranted by medical conditions, irrespective of whether the request is submitted pre- and post-acquisition, or by an owner, tenant, or occupant of a dwelling unit.

 

This language in FHA and the PWDCRA makes sense, as individuals may develop disabilities as a result of illnesses, injuries, the aging process, and other life events–long after an individual begins dwelling in a housing unit. The Court of Appeals’ decision, unfortunately, deprives disability protections to one of Michigan’s most vulnerable populations.

Plaintiffs in the case have filed an Application for Leave to Appeal with the Michigan Supreme Court. The Fair Housing Center of Metropolitan Detroit, along with the Fair Housing Centers of Southeast & Mid Michigan, Southwest Michigan, and West Michigan, have filed an amicus brief urging the Michigan Supreme Court to reverse the Court of Appeals’ decision and statutory construction. The Michigan Civil Rights Commission and the Michigan Department of Civil Rights have also filed an amicus brief in support of the Application for Leave to Appeal.

It may take 4-6 months or more for the Michigan Supreme Court to issue its ruling in the case, given the Court’s heavy docket.

 

 

 

 

 

 

By Steve Tomkowiak December 2, 2025
Lisa joined the Center after nearly 30 years of experience as a wheelchair user and close to 17 years advocating for the rights of people with disabilities. In 2008, Lisa founded Warriors on Wheels of Metropolitan Detroit (“WOW”) and currently serves as its Executive Director and CEO. Through WOW, Lisa focuses on disability rights, accessibility, and community engagement. In these efforts, Lisa not only seeks to meet the critical needs for civic access and passageways, affordable housing units, and safe, reliable transportation, but strives to transform these accessibility points into cohesive design visions that impact communities for a better tomorrow. As Lisa puts it, she “makes it a priority to impact the urban communities in the cities of Detroit, Highland Park, Hamtramck, and Dearborn on compliance with the ADA and other laws, not just technically, but addressing human spirit, morals, and values.” Lisa’s civic involvement and service are broad and varied, ranging from her service on the State of Michigan’s Barrier Free Design Board for Accessibility to her services on the Regional Transit Authority of Southeast Michigan and the City of Detroit’s Human Rights Commission. In recent years, 50-60% or more of the Center’s complaints involve claims of discrimination against persons with disabilities. The Center has assisted and initiated numerous enforcement actions involving disability discrimination. The Center’s Board and Staff welcome the valuable perspective and expertise that Lisa will bring as a new Board member.
By Steve Tomkowiak August 26, 2025
Our friends at the Grosse Pointe Board of Realtors (GPBR) have invited everyone to join them at a chili cookoff event on October 15, 2025, from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m., at The Rivers of Grosse Pointe, 900 Cook Rd, Grosse Pointe Woods, MI 48236 . The GPBR has asked the Center to take a few minutes to explain why fair housing remains so important today. The competition will be fierce. The chili promises to be insanely good. This should be a lot of fun. Please take a short lunch break from your busy schedule to join us.
By Steve Tomkowiak July 31, 2025
Our lack of understanding impacts our ability to address the problem of homelessness
By Steve Tomkowiak July 14, 2025
Question No. 1: As of 2021, what percent of the U.S. population are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing? 1.6% 2.6% 3.6% 4.6% 5.6% Question No. 2: How many deaf people live in the U.S. as of 2021? 3 million 5 million 7 million 9 million 11 million Question No. 3: Which of the following statements are false? A. Deaf persons do not want to speak or cannot speak. B. Every Deaf person knows ASL. C. ASL is English translated into signs. D. ASL is universal. E. ASL interpreters merely translate words. F. ASL is inferior to spoken language. G. Lip reading is a reliable or effective form of communication. H. ASL interpreters are unnecessary if a Deaf individual may write back and forth. Question No. 4: What federal and state laws require ASL services? Are you aware of the requirement of a written ASL policy and, if so, what a compliant policy looks like? If these questions are difficult, please review our PowerPoint: American Sign Language (ASL) & Fair Housing Requirements and the Sample ASL Nondiscrimination Policies (in Word format) available out our Services & Resources page. ________________________________ Answers: Question No. 1: 3.6% Question No. 2: 11 million Question No. 3: All of the statements are false. Question No. 4: What federal and state laws require ASL services? Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (commonly known as the Affordable Care Act or “ACA”); Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988; and many state civil rights statutes .
By Steve Tomkowiak March 25, 2025
A prior post summarized the allegations in a federal court case that was filed after numerous incidents of alleged racial harassment that drove a Black family their Grosse Point Park home. Black Woman and Her Daughter Sue Former White Neighbor for KKK Flag Display and Other Threats . On March 21, 2025, U.S. District Court Judge Linda V. Parker, after carefully reviewing the allegations in the complaint and applicable law, entered an Opinion and Order Denying Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. Judge Parker found that the complaint sufficiently alleged racial animus in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1982. The facts are deplorable, as those who read the decision will no doubt notice, and embarrassing to our community. Congratulations to the students attorneys from the U of M Law School’s Civil Rights Litigation Initiative (CRLI) handling the litigation, under the fine leadership of long-time fair housing attorney and now U of M Law School Professor Mike Steinberg . Opinion and Order Denying Motion to Dismiss, Dinges v. Wilde, No. 23-12885 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 21, 2025)
By Steve Tomkowiak March 7, 2025
University of Michigan Law School Professor Michelle Adams ’ research interests include race discrimination, school desegregation, affirmative action, and housing law. Two of Professor Adams’ students, Michelle Landry and Victoria Pedri (pictured above) from Professor Adams’ Race, Law, and History course, developed a “ Detroit School Integration Timeline ”. The timeline traces the history from Detroit’s establishment of its first “colored school”, to the Dred Scott decision, the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1875, the Great Migration, racially restrictive covenants, redlining, the Birwood (Eight Mile) Wall, white flight, the enactment of the Fair Housing Act, the Milliken v. Bradley decision and efforts to desegregate Detroit schools, through the recent decision in Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard. The timeline is informative, user-friendly and includes many helpful videos. Congratulations to Michelle and Victoria for creating this amazing resource. Detroit School Integration Timeline Legal History Project: Detroit, Michigan (Law students Michelle Landry and Victoria Pedri briefly introduce themselves and thank viewers for checking out their timeline project)
By Steve Tomkowiak December 10, 2024
The Livonia Housing Commission has announced the opening of its Housing Choice Voucher (HVC) waiting list. To apply successfully, you need to provide the Commission with the following information: The first and last names of all members of your household The Social security numbers and birthdates of all members of your household. Total gross annual income of everyone in your household. This includes wages, child support, Social Security, Supplemental Security Income (SSI), General Assistance and Unemployment Income. A valid mailing address and email address. Only one application is permitted per household. Accurate information must be submitted in order to contact applicants if they are selected in the lottery. How to Apply Use this link to start the application process. At the bottom of the page, click Get Started . Persons with disabilities who require accommodations with the online waitlist application, may call the Livonia Housing Commission at (734) 634-0294 or send an email to kwesley@livonia.gov . (If you do not have the social security numbers, please contact the Fair Housing Center by phone at 313-579-3247 or by email to info@fairhousingdetroit.org.)
By Steve Tomkowiak November 13, 2024
Our down payment program has been a great success. A total of 11 families are now owners of new homes: 1. Nen Detroit $1,545 2. Shi'Toya Detroit $5,268 3. Alma Detroit $2,056 4. Danielle Detroit $4,494 5. Demetrius Detroit $5,048 6. Danyelle Warren $9,845 7. Crystal Detroit $10,000 8. Michael Detroit $4,293 9. Demario & Lavontae Detroit $9,136 10. Sharmika Detroit $8,380 11. Crystal Detroit $5,400
By Steve Tomkowiak September 21, 2024
We are very pleased to have helped these new home buyers: Nen Detroit $1,545 Shi'Toya Detroit $5,268 Alma Detroit $2,056 Danielle Detroit $4,494 Demetrius Detroit $5,049 Danyelle Warren $9,845 Crystal Detroit $10,000 Funds are limited. If you need assistance, please contact us or have your lender contact us right away.
By Steve Tomkowiak August 30, 2024
Yes, but the policy must be carefully reviewed.