Limiting the Number of Family Members Per Bedroom

Sam Stragand • August 28, 2020

Familial status discrimination is one of the most common types of housing discrimination reported to and investigated by fair housing organizations like the Fair Housing Center of Metropolitan Detroit, despite – or maybe because of – familial status being one of the less known protected classes under the federal Fair Housing Act. Familial status discrimination, or discrimination against families with children under the age of eighteen, can occur in a host of forms, ranging from families being denied rental housing because of their children to teenage children being subject to overly restrictive and targeted house rules requiring unnecessary supervision.

Another common form of familial status discrimination involves unduly and unlawfully restricting the number of family members who can sleep in a bedroom. Specifically, some housing providers enforce a strict policy of allowing only “two heartbeats” per bedroom, regardless of the size of the bedroom or the age of its occupants. At first glance, this policy does not directly target families with children like some forms of discrimination do. It simply states a policy that applies to everyone, regardless of whether the occupants are all adult roommates or families with children. However, considering that families with children are almost always larger in household size than occupants without children, this policy has a disproportionately negative impact on families with children. Under this policy, a young couple in a one-bedroom apartment could face eviction for having a new-born baby, and a family of five may never apply to rent a two-bedroom apartment despite the bedrooms being large enough to house the whole family.

Such a policy often runs counter to the local building occupancy code, which normally requires only that a bedroom provides fifty square feet for each of its multiple occupants (or seventy square feet if there is only one occupant). According to this commonly-used code, a 70-square foot bedroom would be suitable for one person, a 100-square foot bedroom would be suitable for two people, a 150-square foot bedroom would be suitable for three people, etc. The purpose behind these codes is to ensure the health and safety of the families living in the units by discouraging overcrowding.

A property limiting occupancy to “two heartbeats” per bedroom regardless of the bedroom’s size is almost certainly not following the local building occupancy code or its health and safety rationale. This type of overly restrictive occupancy policy unlawfully discourages families with children from even applying for a rental home. A family of three or five seeing a “two heartbeat” policy published on a property’s website or rental listing will likely pass over the listing without even attempting to apply. This chilling effect can greatly limit the housing available to families, especially in areas where there is already a paucity of affordable housing.

This also increases rental costs for families with children by forcing them to rent units with more bedroom units than they need. As a result, these overly restrictive policies contribute to the eviction crisis.

If you suspect that your family has been excluded or discouraged from housing because of children under the age of eighteen, please contact the Fair Housing Center for assistance.

By FHCMD Staff July 31, 2026
An FHCMD referral to University of Michigan Law School Civil Rights Litigation Initiative leads to a confidential settlement in a severe Grosse Pointe Park racial harassment case.
By FHCMD Staff July 30, 2026
Understanding what discrimination looks like during the home purchase process and how to protect your rights with lenders, real estate agents, and sellers.
By FHCMD Staff July 28, 2026
Many of us will experience physical changes or cognitive decline as we age. Whether seeking new housing or living in a condo, apartment, rental housing, or even an assisted living facility or nursing home, seniors with disabilities are entitled to fair housing protections. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) , approximately 2 in 5 adults aged 65 and older experience disabilities that affect daily life. Vision or hearing loss, mobility impairment, chronic health conditions, and cognitive decline are more likely to occur or become more significant as people age. Ultimately, disabilities do not have to restrict a person's housing options. Understanding Accommodations and Modifications Disabled individuals, as well as family members and caregivers assisting them, can make requests for accommodations and physical modifications. Common examples include: Physical Modifications: Installing grab bars, raising toilet seat heights, or adding visual safety features like flashing lights connected to fire alarms for individuals with hearing impairments. Rule and Policy Adjustments: Reserved parking space, granting a move to a lower floor, or permitting a live-in caregiver. Communication Support: Sign language interpretation or auxiliary aids. When a resident makes a request, a housing provider may ask for documentation from a healthcare provider linking the disability to the requested accommodation or modification. Housing providers must generally grant these requests as long as they do not impose an excessive cost or unreasonable burden. Housing providers should be mindful of ways that make the accommodation process as accessible as possible. Tenants who are not tech-savvy or who may be experiencing cognitive decline may have challenges completing an online form or using an app. Remaining proactive and offering alternative methods if a resident appears to be struggling with an accommodation process will help ensure that your accommodation and modification request process is accessible. Who Pays for Modifications? Responsibility for modification costs depends on the type of housing. While residents in market-rate housing are generally responsible for funding physical modifications, those living in subsidized or low-income senior communities may not have to pay. Landlords who receive federal financial assistance are required to fund approved reasonable modifications for residents with disabilities. (For a deeper dive into making requests, read our article: Fair Housing Rights: Knowing Your Options for Disability Accommodations and Modifications ) We Are Here to Help You don't have to navigate housing accommodation and modification requests alone—we're here to help. Contact us through our website or give us a call at 313-579-FAIR (3247) to discuss fair housing rights and questions, receive support with addressing possible fair housing law violations, or to receive help in requesting disability accommodations and modifications.
July 21, 2026
Identifying Sexual Harassment in Housing
By FHCMD Staff July 14, 2026
What Every Tenant Should Know
By Gabby Cannon July 9, 2026
Fifth annual event rallies almost two hundred supporters for equal housing opportunity.
By Steve Tomkowiak December 2, 2025
Lisa joined the Center after nearly 30 years of experience as a wheelchair user and close to 17 years advocating for the rights of people with disabilities. In 2008, Lisa founded Warriors on Wheels of Metropolitan Detroit (“WOW”) and currently serves as its Executive Director and CEO. Through WOW, Lisa focuses on disability rights, accessibility, and community engagement. In these efforts, Lisa not only seeks to meet the critical needs for civic access and passageways, affordable housing units, and safe, reliable transportation, but strives to transform these accessibility points into cohesive design visions that impact communities for a better tomorrow. As Lisa puts it, she “makes it a priority to impact the urban communities in the cities of Detroit, Highland Park, Hamtramck, and Dearborn on compliance with the ADA and other laws, not just technically, but addressing human spirit, morals, and values.” Lisa’s civic involvement and service are broad and varied, ranging from her service on the State of Michigan’s Barrier Free Design Board for Accessibility to her services on the Regional Transit Authority of Southeast Michigan and the City of Detroit’s Human Rights Commission. In recent years, 50-60% or more of the Center’s complaints involve claims of discrimination against persons with disabilities. The Center has assisted and initiated numerous enforcement actions involving disability discrimination. The Center’s Board and Staff welcome the valuable perspective and expertise that Lisa will bring as a new Board member.
By Steve Tomkowiak August 26, 2025
Our friends at the Grosse Pointe Board of Realtors (GPBR) have invited everyone to join them at a chili cookoff event on October 15, 2025, from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m., at The Rivers of Grosse Pointe, 900 Cook Rd, Grosse Pointe Woods, MI 48236 . The GPBR has asked the Center to take a few minutes to explain why fair housing remains so important today. The competition will be fierce. The chili promises to be insanely good. This should be a lot of fun. Please take a short lunch break from your busy schedule to join us.
By Steve Tomkowiak July 31, 2025
Our lack of understanding impacts our ability to address the problem of homelessness
By Steve Tomkowiak July 14, 2025
Question No. 1: As of 2021, what percent of the U.S. population are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing? 1.6% 2.6% 3.6% 4.6% 5.6% Question No. 2: How many deaf people live in the U.S. as of 2021? 3 million 5 million 7 million 9 million 11 million Question No. 3: Which of the following statements are false? A. Deaf persons do not want to speak or cannot speak. B. Every Deaf person knows ASL. C. ASL is English translated into signs. D. ASL is universal. E. ASL interpreters merely translate words. F. ASL is inferior to spoken language. G. Lip reading is a reliable or effective form of communication. H. ASL interpreters are unnecessary if a Deaf individual may write back and forth. Question No. 4: What federal and state laws require ASL services? Are you aware of the requirement of a written ASL policy and, if so, what a compliant policy looks like? If these questions are difficult, please review our PowerPoint: American Sign Language (ASL) & Fair Housing Requirements and the Sample ASL Nondiscrimination Policies (in Word format) available out our Services & Resources page. ________________________________ Answers: Question No. 1: 3.6% Question No. 2: 11 million Question No. 3: All of the statements are false. Question No. 4: What federal and state laws require ASL services? Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (commonly known as the Affordable Care Act or “ACA”); Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988; and many state civil rights statutes .