Canton Apartments Forced Out Over 70 Recovering Addicts

Steve Tomkowiak • May 19, 2020

On May 11, 2020, a federal lawsuit was filed against the owners and managers of the Crossings at Canton apartment complex, alleging violations of the Fair Housing Act and the Michigan Persons with Disabilities Civil Rights Act. The complaint was filed in U.S. District Court in Detroit by Personalized Nursing LIGHT House (PNLH), its President Joseph Paliwoda, and the Fair Housing Center of Metropolitan Detroit.

PNLH provides comprehensive treatment for substance abuse, which includes providing housing for its clients. PNLH pays for and supervises the residents in the apartments it rents. PNLH rent payments were never late, and there was no history of complaints about noise or other issues involving PNLH clients residing at the Crossings at Canton.

The lawsuit details the multiple efforts by owners and management of the Canton Township, Mich. apartment complex to evict over 70 of the PNLH clients in its residential substance abuse recovery program. According to the complaint, PNLH, which is based in Plymouth, Michigan, had rented apartments at the Crossings at Canton to be used by its clients since at least 2004. Nonetheless, between December 2018 and October 2019, the Crossing at Canton management served “notices to quit” on PNLH, forcing PNLH to scramble to find new apartments for the 74 clients who had been living there.

Paliwoda, who helped found PNLH in 1990 and has served as its president since then, was sidelined from almost all other work for months as he and his team contacted over 60 different apartment complexes before finding one that would rent to PNLH clients. “Discrimination against people suffering from addiction is rampant and blatant in our culture,” Paliwoda said. “It’s extremely hard to convince a property manager to give our clients a chance. It’s hard even when we guarantee the rent – even when we pay a premium – and provide supervision.”

The 24-page complaint asserts that the defendants informed PNLH CEO Joseph Paliwoda in early 2019 that it would not be renewing any of the company’s leases because those units were to be remodeled. At the time, Paliwoda informed Crossings management that he would be happy to relocate his clients to other, open units in the complex.

The defendants’ on-site manager responded by informing Paliwoda that there was no inventory available for any PNLH clients at the Crossings at Canton, which comprises some 700 units. Throughout the period that PNLH clients were being evicted, Paliwoda said he continued to receive multiple marketing and promotional materials from the Crossings which advertised vacancies and move-in specials being offered to the general public. The complaint states that the comment and related actions made it clear “that the Crossings no longer wanted to rent to PNLH because the PNLH clients were in addiction recovery programs.”

“Despite all the recent media coverage of our country’s opiate epidemic and a significant improvement in the general population’s understanding of addiction, recovering substance abusers still face stigmatization and discrimination in some form almost every day,” said Paliwoda, who has worked with recovering substance abusers for decades. Paliwoda says that the management of the apartment complex which is now housing the formerly displaced PNLH clients has informed him that his clients are “a joy to work with.”

Steve Tomkowiak, the Executive Director of the Fair Housing Center, has met with many of the PNLH clients. Tomkowiak commented that “it is very troubling to see a large number of persons who voluntarily agreed to participate in an intensive drug and alcohol treatment program, persons we would expect to be supported in their efforts to reestablish productive lives, instead be thrown out of their homes.” According to Tomkowiak, “this is why we need fair housing laws.”

The lawsuit requests that the court issue an order finding the defendant’s actions in violation of the Fair Housing Act and Michigan Persons with Disabilities Civil Rights Act; an order enjoining the defendants from participation in further housing discrimination on grounds of disability; actual and compensatory damages; punitive damages; and attorneys’ fees and costs.

The lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, and has been assigned to Judge Bernard A. Friedman.

The lawsuit is the subject of an article in Crain’s Detroit Business, entitled, “ Nonprofit sues Canton apartment complex alleging discrimination of recovering substance abusers”.

By FHCMD Staff July 31, 2026
An FHCMD referral to University of Michigan Law School Civil Rights Litigation Initiative leads to a confidential settlement in a severe Grosse Pointe Park racial harassment case.
By FHCMD Staff July 30, 2026
Understanding what discrimination looks like during the home purchase process and how to protect your rights with lenders, real estate agents, and sellers.
By FHCMD Staff July 28, 2026
Many of us will experience physical changes or cognitive decline as we age. Whether seeking new housing or living in a condo, apartment, rental housing, or even an assisted living facility or nursing home, seniors with disabilities are entitled to fair housing protections. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) , approximately 2 in 5 adults aged 65 and older experience disabilities that affect daily life. Vision or hearing loss, mobility impairment, chronic health conditions, and cognitive decline are more likely to occur or become more significant as people age. Ultimately, disabilities do not have to restrict a person's housing options. Understanding Accommodations and Modifications Disabled individuals, as well as family members and caregivers assisting them, can make requests for accommodations and physical modifications. Common examples include: Physical Modifications: Installing grab bars, raising toilet seat heights, or adding visual safety features like flashing lights connected to fire alarms for individuals with hearing impairments. Rule and Policy Adjustments: Reserved parking space, granting a move to a lower floor, or permitting a live-in caregiver. Communication Support: Sign language interpretation or auxiliary aids. When a resident makes a request, a housing provider may ask for documentation from a healthcare provider linking the disability to the requested accommodation or modification. Housing providers must generally grant these requests as long as they do not impose an excessive cost or unreasonable burden. Housing providers should be mindful of ways that make the accommodation process as accessible as possible. Tenants who are not tech-savvy or who may be experiencing cognitive decline may have challenges completing an online form or using an app. Remaining proactive and offering alternative methods if a resident appears to be struggling with an accommodation process will help ensure that your accommodation and modification request process is accessible. Who Pays for Modifications? Responsibility for modification costs depends on the type of housing. While residents in market-rate housing are generally responsible for funding physical modifications, those living in subsidized or low-income senior communities may not have to pay. Landlords who receive federal financial assistance are required to fund approved reasonable modifications for residents with disabilities. (For a deeper dive into making requests, read our article: Fair Housing Rights: Knowing Your Options for Disability Accommodations and Modifications ) We Are Here to Help You don't have to navigate housing accommodation and modification requests alone—we're here to help. Contact us through our website or give us a call at 313-579-FAIR (3247) to discuss fair housing rights and questions, receive support with addressing possible fair housing law violations, or to receive help in requesting disability accommodations and modifications.
July 21, 2026
Identifying Sexual Harassment in Housing
By FHCMD Staff July 14, 2026
What Every Tenant Should Know
By Gabby Cannon July 9, 2026
Fifth annual event rallies almost two hundred supporters for equal housing opportunity.
By Steve Tomkowiak December 2, 2025
Lisa joined the Center after nearly 30 years of experience as a wheelchair user and close to 17 years advocating for the rights of people with disabilities. In 2008, Lisa founded Warriors on Wheels of Metropolitan Detroit (“WOW”) and currently serves as its Executive Director and CEO. Through WOW, Lisa focuses on disability rights, accessibility, and community engagement. In these efforts, Lisa not only seeks to meet the critical needs for civic access and passageways, affordable housing units, and safe, reliable transportation, but strives to transform these accessibility points into cohesive design visions that impact communities for a better tomorrow. As Lisa puts it, she “makes it a priority to impact the urban communities in the cities of Detroit, Highland Park, Hamtramck, and Dearborn on compliance with the ADA and other laws, not just technically, but addressing human spirit, morals, and values.” Lisa’s civic involvement and service are broad and varied, ranging from her service on the State of Michigan’s Barrier Free Design Board for Accessibility to her services on the Regional Transit Authority of Southeast Michigan and the City of Detroit’s Human Rights Commission. In recent years, 50-60% or more of the Center’s complaints involve claims of discrimination against persons with disabilities. The Center has assisted and initiated numerous enforcement actions involving disability discrimination. The Center’s Board and Staff welcome the valuable perspective and expertise that Lisa will bring as a new Board member.
By Steve Tomkowiak August 26, 2025
Our friends at the Grosse Pointe Board of Realtors (GPBR) have invited everyone to join them at a chili cookoff event on October 15, 2025, from 11 a.m. to 1 p.m., at The Rivers of Grosse Pointe, 900 Cook Rd, Grosse Pointe Woods, MI 48236 . The GPBR has asked the Center to take a few minutes to explain why fair housing remains so important today. The competition will be fierce. The chili promises to be insanely good. This should be a lot of fun. Please take a short lunch break from your busy schedule to join us.
By Steve Tomkowiak July 31, 2025
Our lack of understanding impacts our ability to address the problem of homelessness
By Steve Tomkowiak July 14, 2025
Question No. 1: As of 2021, what percent of the U.S. population are deaf or have serious difficulty hearing? 1.6% 2.6% 3.6% 4.6% 5.6% Question No. 2: How many deaf people live in the U.S. as of 2021? 3 million 5 million 7 million 9 million 11 million Question No. 3: Which of the following statements are false? A. Deaf persons do not want to speak or cannot speak. B. Every Deaf person knows ASL. C. ASL is English translated into signs. D. ASL is universal. E. ASL interpreters merely translate words. F. ASL is inferior to spoken language. G. Lip reading is a reliable or effective form of communication. H. ASL interpreters are unnecessary if a Deaf individual may write back and forth. Question No. 4: What federal and state laws require ASL services? Are you aware of the requirement of a written ASL policy and, if so, what a compliant policy looks like? If these questions are difficult, please review our PowerPoint: American Sign Language (ASL) & Fair Housing Requirements and the Sample ASL Nondiscrimination Policies (in Word format) available out our Services & Resources page. ________________________________ Answers: Question No. 1: 3.6% Question No. 2: 11 million Question No. 3: All of the statements are false. Question No. 4: What federal and state laws require ASL services? Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990; Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (commonly known as the Affordable Care Act or “ACA”); Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988; and many state civil rights statutes .